Keating v. Cambre

420 So. 2d 1355, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 8285
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 4, 1982
DocketNo. 82-CA-70
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 420 So. 2d 1355 (Keating v. Cambre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keating v. Cambre, 420 So. 2d 1355, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 8285 (La. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

BOWES, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellees have filed a motion to dismiss an appeal taken by the defendants-appellants.

The sole argument of the appellees is that the defendants have neither appeared nor filed a timely brief and that the appeal should be considered abandoned and dismissed. They cite Section 5(b) of Rule VII of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal. We do not agree with this argument.

Since July 1, 1982 the Revised Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal became effective and must be applied to this matter.

As provided by current Rule 2-12.12: “If the brief on behalf of any party is not filed by the date that the brief is due, the party’s right to oral argument shall be forfeited. The court may also impose other sanctions including, but not limited to, dismissal of the appeal when the appellant does not file a brief provided for in Rule 2-8.6.”

In accordance with Rule 2-8.6, should the appellant not file his brief timely, “a notice shall be mailed by the Clerk to counsel for the appellant, or to the appellant if not represented, that the appeal shall be dismissed 30 days after such notice is mailed, the appeal shall be dismissed as abandoned.”

In the ease before us, the appellant’s brief was due on September 13, 1982, however, his brief was filed on September 27, 1982. Thus, in accordance with Rule 2-12.-12, the appellants’ right to oral argument shall be forfeited. This appeal cannot be dismissed under Rule 2-8.6 since the appellants did file their brief on September 27, 1982.

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

MOTION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. J.E.
160 So. 3d 1065 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
Pena v. Delchamps, Inc.
960 So. 2d 988 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007)
Keating v. Cambre
446 So. 2d 1222 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 So. 2d 1355, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 8285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keating-v-cambre-lactapp-1982.