Keasby & Mattison Co. v. Philip Cary Mfg. Co.
113 F. 432, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4735
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided December 27, 1901·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
The bill of complaint includes a cause of action for unfair competition in trade, of which this court is without jurisdiction for want of the necessary diversity of citizenship, with a cause of action on a patent, of which the court has jurisdiction. The demurrer must therefore be sustained for this multifariousness. The plaintiff may, however, discontinue the former within 10 days, and, if this is done, the demurrer may* be overruled, the defendant to answer over by February rule day.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keasby & Mattison Co. v. Philip Cary Mfg. Co., 113 F. 432, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4735 (circtsdny 1901).
113 F. 432 (Keasby & Mattison Co. v. Philip Cary Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.
62 F.2d 139 (Eighth Circuit, 1932)
Vogue Co. v. Vogue Hat Co.
12 F.2d 991 (Sixth Circuit, 1926)
Unit Const. Co. v. Huskey Mfg. Co.
241 F. 129 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1917)
Schiebel Toy & Novelty Co. v. Clark
217 F. 760 (Sixth Circuit, 1914)
Ludwigs v. Payson Mfg. Co.
206 F. 60 (Seventh Circuit, 1913)
Johnston v. Brass Goods Mfg. Co.
201 F. 368 (E.D. New York, 1912)
T. B. Woods Sons Co. v. Valley Iron Works
166 F. 770 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania, 1909)