Keasby & Mattison Co. v. Philip Cary Mfg. Co.
This text of 113 F. 432 (Keasby & Mattison Co. v. Philip Cary Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill of complaint includes a cause of action for unfair competition in trade, of which this court is without jurisdiction for want of the necessary diversity of citizenship, with a cause of action on a patent, of which the court has jurisdiction. The demurrer must therefore be sustained for this multifariousness. The plaintiff may, however, discontinue the former within 10 days, and, if this is done, the demurrer may* be overruled, the defendant to answer over by February rule day.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 F. 432, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keasby-mattison-co-v-philip-cary-mfg-co-circtsdny-1901.