Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. Philip Carey Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. Philip Carey Co.

121 F. 1023, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5395

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 121 F. 1023 (Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. Philip Carey Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. Philip Carey Co., 121 F. 1023, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5395 (circtsdny 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The motion for an order directing that all further evidence be taken in open court is denied. The court has carefully read the deposition of the witness Mattison. called by the complainant, including the 1,300 cross-questions, and all the objections and comments of counsel which accompanied the taking of the testimony. No comment is now made on this fraction of the record. It will have to be considered by the judge who hears the cause, in connection with the other evidence. In view of the impression produced by this examination of the deposition, however, it may be proper to suggest to counsel for the defendants that they might with advantage to themselves make the most of such time as remains out of that allotted for the taking of their proofs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The motion for an order directing that all further evidence be taken in open court is denied. The court has carefully read the deposition of the witness Mattison. called by the complainant, including the 1,300 cross-questions, and all the objections and comments of counsel which accompanied the taking of the testimony. No comment is now made on this fraction of the record. It will have to be considered by the judge who hears the cause, in connection with the other evidence. In view of the impression produced by this examination of the deposition, however, it may be proper to suggest to counsel for the defendants that they might with advantage to themselves make the most of such time as remains out of that allotted for the taking of their proofs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 F. 1023, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keasbey-mattison-co-v-philip-carey-co-circtsdny-1903.