Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.

145 F. 202, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4978

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 6, 1905·Published

Opinion

RAY, District Judge.

The same questions involved here, substantially, have recently been passed upon by the Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, in Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. American Magnesia & Covering Co., 143 Fed. 490. It is only necessary for this court to refer to the opinion of that court in that case. The views there expressed are adopted.

There will be a decree accordingly and for an accounting. The patent is valid. Keasbey was the inventor, and defendant infringes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RAY, District Judge.

The same questions involved here, substantially, have recently been passed upon by the Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, in Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. American Magnesia & Covering Co., 143 Fed. 490. It is only necessary for this court to refer to the opinion of that court in that case. The views there expressed are adopted.

There will be a decree accordingly and for an accounting. The patent is valid. Keasbey was the inventor, and defendant infringes.

Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co., 145 F. 202, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4978 (circtsdny 1905).

Pincite

145 F. 202 (Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related