Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.

145 F. 202, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4978

This text of 145 F. 202 (Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co., 145 F. 202, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4978 (circtsdny 1905).

Opinion

RAY, District Judge.

The same questions involved here, substantially, have recently been passed upon by the Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, in Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. American Magnesia & Covering Co., 143 Fed. 490. It is only necessary for this court to refer to the opinion of that court in that case. The views there expressed are adopted.

There will be a decree accordingly and for an accounting. The patent is valid. Keasbey was the inventor, and defendant infringes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 F. 202, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keasbey-mattison-co-v-h-w-johns-manville-co-circtsdny-1905.