Kearse v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kearse v. State

756 So. 2d 266, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3703, 2000 WL 313543

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 29, 2000

DocketNo. 4D98-2905

StatusPublished

This text of 756 So. 2d 266 (Kearse v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kearse v. State, 756 So. 2d 266, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3703, 2000 WL 313543 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence as a prison releasee reoffender, finding that the statute is constitutional. See Edwards v. State, 753 So.2d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Simmons v. State, 755 So.2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), rev. granted, no. SC96465, 751 So.2d 1253 (Fla. Jan. 18, 2000); Jennings v. State, 744 So.2d 1126, 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Rollinson v. State, 743 So.2d 585, 587-90 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

We reverse and vacate the misdemeanor judgment and conviction under count II of the information. As part of the plea agreement, the state agreed to nolle prosse the charge and appellant did not enter a plea as to the same. Therefore, the court erred in entering a judgment and sentence on count II. See Lingenfelser v. State, 734 So.2d 472, 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). On remand, the state should abide by its plea agreement and enter a nolle prossequi as to the misdemeanor charge.

WARNER, C.J., FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence as a prison releasee reoffender, finding that the statute is constitutional. See Edwards v. State, 753 So.2d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Simmons v. State, 755 So.2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), rev. granted, no. SC96465, 751 So.2d 1253 (Fla. Jan. 18, 2000); Jennings v. State, 744 So.2d 1126, 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Rollinson v. State, 743 So.2d 585, 587-90 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

We reverse and vacate the misdemeanor judgment and conviction under count II of the information. As part of the plea agreement, the state agreed to nolle prosse the charge and appellant did not enter a plea as to the same. Therefore, the court erred in entering a judgment and sentence on count II. See Lingenfelser v. State, 734 So.2d 472, 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). On remand, the state should abide by its plea agreement and enter a nolle prossequi as to the misdemeanor charge.

WARNER, C.J., FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

756 So. 2d 266, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3703, 2000 WL 313543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kearse-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack