Kearns v. Vahey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kearns v. Vahey

424 So. 2d 185, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21546

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 1983·No. No. 81-1985·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered this appeal on the merits, it is hereby dismissed by virtue of appellant’s having accepted the benefits of the final judgment. See, McMullen v. Fort Pierce Financing and Construction Company, 146 So. 567 (Fla.1933). The cross-appeal has also been considered and found to be without merit. The judgment is thus affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered this appeal on the merits, it is hereby dismissed by virtue of appellant’s having accepted the benefits of the final judgment. See, McMullen v. Fort Pierce Financing and Construction Company, 146 So. 567 (Fla.1933). The cross-appeal has also been considered and found to be without merit. The judgment is thus affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur;

Kearns v. Vahey, 424 So. 2d 185, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21546 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

424 So. 2d 185 (Kearns v. Vahey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related