Kearns v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kearns v. State

575 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1878, 1991 WL 29488

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 1991·No. No. 89-00154·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s conviction of third-degree grand theft. We strike the imposition of costs without prejudice to the state seeking reimposition after proper notice and hearing. We strike condition 22 of the appellant’s probation. We remand for correction of the appellant’s order of probation to reflect that she was convicted of third-degree, rather than second-degree, grand theft.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s conviction of third-degree grand theft. We strike the imposition of costs without prejudice to the state seeking reimposition after proper notice and hearing. We strike condition 22 of the appellant’s probation. We remand for correction of the appellant’s order of probation to reflect that she was convicted of third-degree, rather than second-degree, grand theft.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Kearns v. State, 575 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1878, 1991 WL 29488 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

575 So. 2d 330 (Kearns v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related