Kearns v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kearns v. State

575 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1878, 1991 WL 29488

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 1991

DocketNo. 89-00154

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 575 So. 2d 330 (Kearns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kearns v. State, 575 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1878, 1991 WL 29488 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s conviction of third-degree grand theft. We strike the imposition of costs without prejudice to the state seeking reimposition after proper notice and hearing. We strike condition 22 of the appellant’s probation. We remand for correction of the appellant’s order of probation to reflect that she was convicted of third-degree, rather than second-degree, grand theft.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s conviction of third-degree grand theft. We strike the imposition of costs without prejudice to the state seeking reimposition after proper notice and hearing. We strike condition 22 of the appellant’s probation. We remand for correction of the appellant’s order of probation to reflect that she was convicted of third-degree, rather than second-degree, grand theft.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 So. 2d 330, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1878, 1991 WL 29488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kearns-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack