Kearns V. Board of Education
This text of 254 A.D. 486 (Kearns V. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioners were never appointed to the position of clerical assistant and, therefore, should not be designated as such. In the absence of a valid appointment from a proper list, the petitioners may not be designated as incumbents, even though they performed the duties of that position. (Wood v. City of New York, 274 N. Y. 155; Farrell v. City of Buffalo, 118 App. Div. 597.)
The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the defendant, and the petition dismissed.
Present — O’Malley, Townley, Untermybr, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the defendant, and the petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 486, 5 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kearns-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1938.