Kearney v. Pierson

California Court of Appeal

Kearney v. Pierson

18 Cal. App. 521

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 15, 1912

DocketCiv. No. 1017

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Cal. App. 521 (Kearney v. Pierson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kearney v. Pierson, 18 Cal. App. 521 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, J.

This case is in all respects similar to the case of Hattie M. Kearney v. John Palmer et al., ante, p. 517, [123 Pac. 611], save that the action is one in ejectment and not [522]*522to quiet title, and for the same reasons the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 15, 1912.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, J.

This case is in all respects similar to the case of Hattie M. Kearney v. John Palmer et al., ante, p. 517, [123 Pac. 611], save that the action is one in ejectment and not [522]*522to quiet title, and for the same reasons the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 15, 1912.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Cal. App. 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kearney-v-pierson-calctapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack