Kearney v. Pierson

California Court of Appeal

Kearney v. Pierson

18 Cal. App. 521

California Court of Appeal·Decided March 15, 1912·No. Civ. No. 1017·Published

Opinion

HALL, J.

This case is in all respects similar to the case of Hattie M. Kearney v. John Palmer et al., ante, p. 517, [123 Pac. 611], save that the action is one in ejectment and not [522]*522to quiet title, and for the same reasons the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 15, 1912.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, J.

This case is in all respects similar to the case of Hattie M. Kearney v. John Palmer et al., ante, p. 517, [123 Pac. 611], save that the action is one in ejectment and not [522]*522to quiet title, and for the same reasons the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 15, 1912.

Kearney v. Pierson, 18 Cal. App. 521 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

18 Cal. App. 521 (Kearney v. Pierson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related