Kearney v. M'Cullough
5 Binn. 389, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 3
Opinion
The court in July, being held for one day only, for the purpose of receiving returns, has not generally been considered as a meeting of business. It is true the motion might then have been made. But we think the defendant cannot be said to have been in default, in not making the motion sooner than the December term following.
No cause being shewn,
Attachment dissolved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kearney v. M'Cullough, 5 Binn. 389, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 3 (Pa. 1813).
5 Binn. 389 (Kearney v. M'Cullough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Andrews v. Lee
3 Pen. & W. 99 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1831)