Kearney v. M'Cullough

5 Binn. 389, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 3
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 9, 1813
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Binn. 389 (Kearney v. M'Cullough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kearney v. M'Cullough, 5 Binn. 389, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 3 (Pa. 1813).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court in July, being held for one day only, for the purpose of receiving returns, has not generally been considered as a meeting of business. It is true the motion might then have been made. But we think the defendant cannot be said to have been in default, in not making the motion sooner than the December term following.

No cause being shewn,

Attachment dissolved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andrews v. Lee
3 Pen. & W. 99 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1831)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Binn. 389, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kearney-v-mcullough-pa-1813.