Kearney v. Holmes

6 La. Ann. 373
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 La. Ann. 373 (Kearney v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kearney v. Holmes, 6 La. Ann. 373 (La. 1851).

Opinions

The judgment of the court (Preston, J., dissenting in part) was pronounced by

Rost, J.

The evidence in the record satisfies us that the plaintiff, so far from exercising his legitimate legal rights in his numerous suits against the defendant, has used the process of courts for the sole purpose of vexing and harrassing him, without any reasonable hope or expectation of recovering any portion of the sum claimed. The fact that he agreed to take less wages from the defendant than he was receiving in another house, has no weight with us. It may not have been optional with him to remain in that house, and he may have had many motives for making the change, besides the belief that he was to become the partner of the defendant. We are of opinion that the judgment .should be affirmed in both cases.

Judgment affirmed in both cases, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Succession of Cutrer v. Curtis
341 So. 2d 1209 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 La. Ann. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kearney-v-holmes-la-1851.