Kearney v. Gough

5 G. & J. 457
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 15, 1833·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Buchanan, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We concur in opinion with the court below, on the first exception.

The decision is in conformity with the settled practice throughout the State, giving to the plaintiff on the record, the opening and conclusion, except in cases of avowry for rent in arrear; in relation to which the practice is not uniform. But we dissent on the second exception.

THE JUDGMENT IS THEREFORE REVERSED AND PROCE-DENDO AWARDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kearney v. Gough, 5 G. & J. 457 (Md. 1833).

5 G. & J. 457 (Kearney v. Gough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yingling v. Hesson
16 Md. 112 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1860)