Kearney v. Collins

2 Miles 13
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County·Decided March 23, 1836·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.—

This is not an “ instrument of writing for the payment of money” within the meaning of the act, for two reasons. 1. It is not an agreement to pay a sum certain, and nothing appears of record by which the amount of the arrears oí interest can be ascertained. 2. It is not an agreement to pay money, but to “ settle” an unascertained amount of interest due on a mortgage. To “ settle” does not always mean a payment, or even a payment in money. It may consist of the mere striking of a balance where there may have been interest accounts, a compromise, composition, payment in goods or the procurement of a release. Nothing on this subject is left to us by the act, by way of inference, to help the plaintiff’s claim to have judgment.

Judgment set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kearney v. Collins, 2 Miles 13 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1836).

2 Miles 13 (Kearney v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Landis v. Kirk
1 Pears. 77 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1854)