Keane v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keane v. Power

26 A.D.2d 567, 272 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3990

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 567 (Keane v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keane v. Power, 26 A.D.2d 567, 272 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under CPLR article 78 inter alia to declare invalid the party call of the Democratic Party in Queens County, dated April 27, 1966 (as amended), petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 1, 1966, which adjudged inter alia that certain designating petitions are valid. Judgment modified, on the law and facts, in accordance with the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties (1) by adding to the names of the persons set forth in the second decretal paragraph of the judgment as candidates for the designated party positions (after the name “Caroline Schmitt”) the names of Francis X. Keane and Gloria C. Bendl; and (2) by eliminating the word “respectively” where it first appears in said second decretal paragraph (after the letter “B”). As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. On motion, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under CPLR article 78 inter alia to declare invalid the party call of the Democratic Party in Queens County, dated April 27, 1966 (as amended), petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 1, 1966, which adjudged inter alia that certain designating petitions are valid. Judgment modified, on the law and facts, in accordance with the stipulation of the attorneys for the respective parties (1) by adding to the names of the persons set forth in the second decretal paragraph of the judgment as candidates for the designated party positions (after the name “Caroline Schmitt”) the names of Francis X. Keane and Gloria C. Bendl; and (2) by eliminating the word “respectively” where it first appears in said second decretal paragraph (after the letter “B”). As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. On motion, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 567, 272 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keane-v-power-nyappdiv-1966.