Keane v. Freeman
This text of 84 F. App'x 846 (Keane v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Michael Patrick Keane appeals summary judgment for defendants in his 42 [847]*847U.S.C. § 1983 action relating to a temporary protection order against him obtained by Keane’s former wife. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Harvey v. Waldron, 210 F.3d 1008, 1013 (9th Cir.2000), and we vacate and remand for consideration in light of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). See Harney, 210 F.3d at 1014.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [847]*847courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keane-v-freeman-ca9-2003.