Keane v. Engel

24 Misc. 761, 53 N.Y.S. 1107
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Misc. 761 (Keane v. Engel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keane v. Engel, 24 Misc. 761, 53 N.Y.S. 1107 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment as to the defendant Johanna Engel should be affirmed, but it must be reversed as to the defendant Gustav Engel, as the evidence is not sufficient to justify the conclusion that he co-operated with his codefendant in the conversion for which the action was brought.

Judgment affirmed, with costs as to the defendant Johanna • Engel, and reversed as to the defendant Gustav Engel, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs as to Johanna Engel, and reversed as to Gustav Engel, and new trial ordered, with costs ° appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Misc. 761, 53 N.Y.S. 1107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keane-v-engel-nyappterm-1898.