Kean v. Dufresne
3 Serg. & Rawle 233
This text of 3 Serg. & Rawle 233 (Kean v. Dufresne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kean v. Dufresne, 3 Serg. & Rawle 233 (Pa. 1817).
Opinion
It appears in this case, that the note set up as an extinguishment of the debt of Kean and Foster, was in fact no more than a note put into the bank, for the purpose' of raising money for Kean and Foster. Therefore, it can be no extinguishment. The note, in fact, was not parted -with by Dufresne, but for the purpose of raising money for Kean and Foster.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bozeman v. Ivey
49 Ala. 75 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1873)
Carlin v. Heller
34 Iowa 256 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1872)
Bradford v. Harper
25 Ala. 337 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1854)
Hays v. M'Clurg
4 Watts 452 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1835)
Olcott v. Rathbone
5 Wend. 490 (New York Supreme Court, 1830)
Whitcomb v. Williams
21 Mass. 228 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1826)
Tudor v. Whiting
12 Mass. 212 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1815)
Chapman v. Durant
10 Mass. 47 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1813)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Serg. & Rawle 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kean-v-dufresne-pa-1817.