Kealoha v. Castle

Hawaii Supreme Court

Kealoha v. Castle

17 Haw. 415, 1906 Haw. LEXIS 71

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, X

All the matters presented in the assignment of errors ivere uassed upon by this court, ante p. 45, on the question reserved by the circuit judge, whether the defendant’s demurrer should be sustained. The circuit judge having been advised by us that the demurrer ought to "be sustained a decree was made by him accordingly, to which the plaintiffs bring this writ of error in order to obtain the final judgment of this court, which is that the decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, X

All the matters presented in the assignment of errors ivere uassed upon by this court, ante p. 45, on the question reserved by the circuit judge, whether the defendant’s demurrer should be sustained. The circuit judge having been advised by us that the demurrer ought to "be sustained a decree was made by him accordingly, to which the plaintiffs bring this writ of error in order to obtain the final judgment of this court, which is that the decree is affirmed.

Kealoha v. Castle, 17 Haw. 415, 1906 Haw. LEXIS 71 (haw 1906).

Pincite

17 Haw. 415 (Kealoha v. Castle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related