Keado v. S. S. Kresge Co.
This text of 232 A.D. 784 (Keado v. S. S. Kresge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order in action of Gertrude Keado v. S. S. Kresge Company unanimously affirmed, with costs. Judgment and order in action of John Keado v. S. S. Kresge Company reversed on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is excessive, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $384, in which event the judgment is so modified and as modified the judgment and order are affirmed, without costs. All concur, except Davis, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance, and Hill, J., who votes for result reached by the majority but assigns the error as one of law made in the court’s charge as to the amount of damages which could be awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keado-v-s-s-kresge-co-nyappdiv-1931.