Keables v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
Opinion
We affirm the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the decision of the appeals referee that Kathryn Keables was not entitled to the unemployment compensation benefits that she had received. Global Home Care, Inc. v. State, Dep’t of Labor and Employment Sec., Div. of Unemployment Comp., 521 So.2d 220 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Further, section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2008), requires Keables to repay the benefits, and it contains no provision excusing repayment based on equitable grounds. Morton v. State, Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 769 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Moreno v. State Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 676 So.2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
31 So. 3d 841 (Keables v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.