Kea v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

798 So. 2d 858, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15636, 2001 WL 1356508
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kea v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15972
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 2001·No. No. 1D01-2331·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On August 3, 2001, the appellant filed a Motion to Dismiss the appeal of an order of the lower tribunal entered on May 8, 2001. On September 7, 2001, the appellant filed a Notice of Withdrawal of Appellants’ Motion to Dismiss. The Court now treats [859]*859the notice of withdrawal as a motion to withdraw the appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Having considered the appellant’s motions, the Court has determined that the May 8, 2001, order is a non-final order that is not independently appealable. Consequently, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Furthermore, the Appellee’s Motion to Strike Notice of Appeal and Portions of the Record on appeal is denied. See Wynn v. State, 557 So.2d 188, 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); White v. State, 267 So.2d 360 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972).

MINER, WOLF, and BENTON, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kea v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 798 So. 2d 858, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15636, 2001 WL 1356508 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

798 So. 2d 858 (Kea v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wynn v. State
557 So. 2d 188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
White v. State
267 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)