K.E. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

K.E. v. State

159 So. 3d 363, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3418, 2015 WL 1048283

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 2015

DocketNo. 3D14-1867

StatusPublished

This text of 159 So. 3d 363 (K.E. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

K.E. v. State, 159 So. 3d 363, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3418, 2015 WL 1048283 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant K.E. seeks reversal of her conviction based on a claim that the trial court failed to conduct an adequate Richardson1 hearing regarding the State’s failure to timely provide certain discovery materials to K.E. The discovery materials in question were photographs of the injuries suffered by the victim during the altercation at issue in the proceedings below.

Under the circumstances here, we conclude that K.E. was not procedurally prejudiced by the discovery violation. Even if the trial court’s Richardson inquiry was inadequate, any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016,1021 (Fla.1995).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant K.E. seeks reversal of her conviction based on a claim that the trial court failed to conduct an adequate Richardson1 hearing regarding the State’s failure to timely provide certain discovery materials to K.E. The discovery materials in question were photographs of the injuries suffered by the victim during the altercation at issue in the proceedings below.

Under the circumstances here, we conclude that K.E. was not procedurally prejudiced by the discovery violation. Even if the trial court’s Richardson inquiry was inadequate, any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016,1021 (Fla.1995).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 So. 3d 363, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3418, 2015 WL 1048283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ke-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack