K.D.B. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

K.D.B. v. State

673 So. 2d 199, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5139, 1996 WL 257366

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 17, 1996

DocketNo. 95-1942

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 199 (K.D.B. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

K.D.B. v. State, 673 So. 2d 199, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5139, 1996 WL 257366 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Hawthorne, 573 So.2d 330, 333 (Fla.1991) (holding that “a court is not tied to fair market value as the sale standard for determining restitution amounts, but rather may exercise such discretion as required to further the purpose of restitution”); see also Hercule v. State, 655 So.2d 1256, 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Anderson v. State, 649 So.2d 890 (Fla. 2d [200]*200DCA 1995); King v. State, 585 So.2d 1199 (Pla. 1st DCA 1991).

W. SHARP, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Hawthorne, 573 So.2d 330, 333 (Fla.1991) (holding that “a court is not tied to fair market value as the sale standard for determining restitution amounts, but rather may exercise such discretion as required to further the purpose of restitution”); see also Hercule v. State, 655 So.2d 1256, 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Anderson v. State, 649 So.2d 890 (Fla. 2d [200]*200DCA 1995); King v. State, 585 So.2d 1199 (Pla. 1st DCA 1991).

W. SHARP, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 So. 2d 199, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5139, 1996 WL 257366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kdb-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack