K.D.B. v. State
673 So. 2d 199, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5139, 1996 WL 257366
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See State v. Hawthorne, 573 So.2d 330, 333 (Fla.1991) (holding that “a court is not tied to fair market value as the sale standard for determining restitution amounts, but rather may exercise such discretion as required to further the purpose of restitution”); see also Hercule v. State, 655 So.2d 1256, 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Anderson v. State, 649 So.2d 890 (Fla. 2d [200] DCA 1995); King v. State, 585 So.2d 1199 (Pla. 1st DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
K.D.B. v. State, 673 So. 2d 199, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5139, 1996 WL 257366 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
673 So. 2d 199 (K.D.B. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dowdy v. State
712 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)