K.D. v. J.R.D.
This text of K.D. v. J.R.D. (K.D. v. J.R.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
K.D.,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D15-2489
J.R.D.,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 4, 2016
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Patti A. Christensen, Judge.
Paulina Forrest, of East Broward Law, Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
WALLIS, J.
K.D. appeals the trial court's order for involuntary treatment for substance abuse.
On May 21, 2015, K.D.'s father, J.R.D., petitioned under the Marchman Act1 for
involuntary substance abuse assessment and stabilization for K.D. On the same day, the
trial court granted the petition ex parte. On May 27, K.D. underwent a biopsychosocial
assessment. On June 1, J.R.D. petitioned for K.D.'s involuntary substance abuse
1 § 397.301 et seq., Fla. Stat. (2015). treatment. The trial court set the petition for hearing on June 16. After the hearing, the
trial court entered its order for K.D.'s involuntary treatment for substance abuse.
Section 397.6955, Florida Statutes (2015), provides that, upon filing of a petition
for the involuntary treatment of a substance abuse impaired person, the trial court "shall
schedule a hearing to be held on the petition within 10 days." Computing the time
according to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.514(a)(1), the last permissible day
for the trial court to schedule a hearing after J.R.D. filed his petition on June 1 was June
11. However, the trial court held a hearing on the petition on June 16, 15 days later. Thus,
because the trial court exceeded the statutory 10-day time limit and lacked jurisdiction
over the petition, we reverse the resulting order.
REVERSED.
LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
K.D. v. J.R.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kd-v-jrd-fladistctapp-2016.