K.C. and O.B. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
This text of K.C. and O.B. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (K.C. and O.B. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00354-CV
Kimberly Compton and Orlando Bell, Appellants
v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 239,406-B, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Kimberly Compton has filed a motion to abate proceedings so that her
attorney may obtain guidance from the trial court about the scope of her appointment on appeal, seek
clarification of the trial court’s nunc pro tunc order, and file a supplemental clerk’s record in this Court.
Compton’s counsel has conferred with counsel for appellant Orlando Bell, counsel for appellee, and the
child’s attorney ad litem, none of whom object to the motion to abate.
This appeal is abated. The parties are instructed to file a report ninety days from the
date of this order informing this Court about the status of the trial court proceedings. Failure to file the
status report within ninety days after the issuance of this order may result in the dismissal of appellant
Compton’s appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin
Abated
Filed: September 14, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
K.C. and O.B. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kc-and-ob-v-texas-department-of-family-and-protect-texapp-2011.