K.B., THE MOTHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
This text of K.B., THE MOTHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES (K.B., THE MOTHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
K.B., the mother, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, Appellees.
No. 4D23-477
[June 7, 2023]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Saint Lucie County; Michael J. Linn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562022DP000206.
Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Council, Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Andrew Feigenbaum of Children’s Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb and Sarah Todd Weitz of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See E.A. v. Dep’t Child. & Fams., 332 So. 3d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021); V.S. v. Dep’t Child. & Fams., 322 So. 3d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).
MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur. WARNER, J., concurs specially with opinion.
WARNER, J., concurring specially.
I concur in the affirmance of the final judgment terminating appellant’s rights to her child, as I am bound by V.S. and E.A. which are controlling in this district. I continue to maintain, however, as I did in my dissent in V.S., that the Legislature cannot abrogate the principles set forth in Padgett v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 577 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 1991), required to assure that the fundamental liberty interest of a parent to his or her child is protected. Only the supreme court can determine whether the constitutional interests of the parents are sufficiently protected under the statutes. In this case, the trial court did not conduct a least restrictive means inquiry, only making a conclusory finding that termination was the least restrictive means, based on E.A. v. Department of Children and Families, 332 So. 3d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021), and section 39.806(2), Florida Statutes (2022).
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
K.B., THE MOTHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kb-the-mother-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2023.