K.B. State v. K.B.
This text of 2018 ND 126 (K.B. State v. K.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*886 [¶ 1] C.D. appeals a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights in K.B. On appeal C.D. argues the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a continuance. The juvenile court terminated C.D.'s parental rights after finding the child was deprived, the deprivation was likely to continue, and the child was in foster care for more than 450 out of the previous 660 nights. The juvenile court denied a continuance because C.D.'s alleged defenses would not preclude termination. Because the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in denying C.D.'s motion for a continuance, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 ND 126, 911 N.W.2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kb-state-v-kb-nd-2018.