Kazmi v. JPMorgan Chase
This text of 585 F. App'x 102 (Kazmi v. JPMorgan Chase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Syed Aftab Kazmi appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts below. Kazmi v. JPMorgan Chase, Nos. 1:14-cv-00024-CMH-TR J; 13-10897-BFK; 13-01087-BFK (E.D. Va. filed May 19, 2014, entered May 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kazmi-v-jpmorgan-chase-ca4-2014.