Kaziu v. Celluzziele LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaziu v. Celluzziele LLC

303 A.D.2d 721, 756 N.Y.S.2d 874

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mason, J.), entered June 5, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

, Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The defendant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment. However, in opposition, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact with respect to apparent authority (see Roach v Szatko, 244 AD2d 470, 472 [1997]; Maurillo v Park Slope U-Haul, 194 AD2d 142, 147 [1993]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint where Charles Vizzini, the father of the defendant’s president, might be found to have been acting as its agent.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mason, J.), entered June 5, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

, Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The defendant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment. However, in opposition, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact with respect to apparent authority (see Roach v Szatko, 244 AD2d 470, 472 [1997]; Maurillo v Park Slope U-Haul, 194 AD2d 142, 147 [1993]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint where Charles Vizzini, the father of the defendant’s president, might be found to have been acting as its agent.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Kaziu v. Celluzziele LLC, 303 A.D.2d 721, 756 N.Y.S.2d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

303 A.D.2d 721 (Kaziu v. Celluzziele LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related