Kazimierski v. Weiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kazimierski v. Weiss

286 A.D.2d 767, 730 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8676

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 24, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D.2d 767 (Kazimierski v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kazimierski v. Weiss, 286 A.D.2d 767, 730 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from a corrected order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), dated May 3, 2000, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Furman, H.E.), dated April 5, 1999, which, after a hearing, denied his petition for a downward modification of child support.

Ordered that the father’s notice of appeal from an order dated September 13, 1999, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the corrected order dated May 3, 2000 (see, CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the corrected order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the father’s petition seeking a downward modification of his child support obligation was properly denied. Altman, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from a corrected order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), dated May 3, 2000, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Furman, H.E.), dated April 5, 1999, which, after a hearing, denied his petition for a downward modification of child support.

Ordered that the father’s notice of appeal from an order dated September 13, 1999, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the corrected order dated May 3, 2000 (see, CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the corrected order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the father’s petition seeking a downward modification of his child support obligation was properly denied. Altman, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 767, 730 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kazimierski-v-weiss-nyappdiv-2001.