Kazim Oladotun Oyenuga v. Adedoyin Anne Oyenuga
This text of Kazim Oladotun Oyenuga v. Adedoyin Anne Oyenuga (Kazim Oladotun Oyenuga v. Adedoyin Anne Oyenuga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 12-14-00187-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 6/16/2015 4:11:03 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK
Case No. 12-14-00187-CV __________________________________________________________________ FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 6/16/2015 4:11:03 PM TWELFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CATHY S. LUSK Clerk ______________________________________________________________________________
KAZIM OLADOTUN OYENUGA, Appellant
v.
ADEDOYIN ANNE OYENUGA, Appellee. ______________________________________________________________________________
Appealed from the 296th Judicial District Court of Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause Number 296-54330-2013 The Honorable John Roach, Presiding __________________________________________________________________
KAZIM OLADOTUN OYENUGA’S SECOND MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL __________________________________________________________________
Niles Illich SBOT: 24069969 The Law Office of Niles Illich, Ph.D., J.D. 701 Commerce Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75202 Direct: (972) 802−1788 Facsimile: (972) 236−0088 Email: Niles@appealstx.com Counsel for Kazim Oladotun Oyenuga Kazim Oyenuga asks this Court to grant him a voluntary dismissal of his
appeal under Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Introduction
1. Kazim Oyenuga is the Appellant and Adedoyin Anne Oyenuga is the
Appellee. This appeal concerns the division of property following a divorce.
2. Appellant was tried in the 296th Judicial District Court of Collin County.
3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 11, 2014. Appellee did not file a
notice of appeal or a notice of cross-appeal.
4. In November 2014, Appellant instructed his attorney to file a motion to
dismiss this appeal. Appellant subsequently decided to continue with the appeal
and instructed his counsel to attempt to withdraw the motion for voluntary
dismissal. This Court did not grant the motion to dismiss and permitted the appeal
to go forward.
5. Appellant is aware that his attorney will refuse to file another motion to
withdraw a motion for voluntary dismissal. Appellant’s counsel is convinced that
Appellant wishes to dismiss this appeal or counsel would not file this motion.
Argument and Authorities
6. There is no specified deadline to file a motion for voluntary dismissal. 1
1 TEX. R. APP. P. 44.2.
2 7. Rule 42.1(a)(1) permits an Appellant to file a motion requesting voluntary
dismissal and an appellate court to “dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed
judgment or order unless such disposition would prevent a party from seeking
relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.”2
8. An appellant is not required to explain his motivation for requesting the
voluntary dismissal nor is he required to sign the motion. 3 But Appellant has asked
his attorney to explain to the Court that he merely wishes to put this marriage
behind him and to “move on with his life,” even at the expense of what he
perceives to be a legally-improper division of the marital property.
Prayer and Conclusion
9. Kazim Oyenuga requests that this Court grant his Motion for Voluntary
Dismissal.
2 Id. at 42.1(a)(1). 3 See generally id. (not requiring a party to show cause for seeking dismissal and signature requirement relates only to criminal appeals). 3 Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Niles Illich Niles Illich The Law Office of Niles Illich, Ph.D., J.D. 701 Commerce Street Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75202-4518 Direct: (972) 802-1788 Fax: (972) 236-0088 Cell: (713) 320-9883 Email: Niles@appealstx.com Counsel for Kazim Oladotun Oyenuga
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
Counsel for Kazim Oyenuga has not conferred on this motion with counsel
for Adedoyin Anne Oyenuga. A conference has not occurred on this Motion
because counsel does not believe that it is necessary as Kazim Oyenuga is the
appellant and is surrendering his appeal.
/s/ Niles Illich Niles Illich
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
This is to certify that this motion is in accordance with Rule 9.4 of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure. This motion is presented in Times New Roman font,
size 14 and contains 642 words.
4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above styled and
captioned Notice of Appearance was served in accordance with Rule 9.5 of the
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on the 16th day of June, 2015 as follows:
ELECTRONIC SERVICE Mr. Stacy Dunlop 2214 Main Street Dallas, Texas 75201
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kazim Oladotun Oyenuga v. Adedoyin Anne Oyenuga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kazim-oladotun-oyenuga-v-adedoyin-anne-oyenuga-texapp-2015.