Kazakhstan Investment Fund Ltd. v. Manolovici

306 A.D.2d 36, 759 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 2003·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 14, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS court properly dismissed plaintiffs complaint seeking damages against a former disinterested director of plaintiff for breach of fiduciary duty and negligence in overseeing plaintiff’s investment manager who allegedly caused plaintiff to lose millions of dollars as a result of three disastrous investments made in 1997. Plaintiff’s claims are untimely since the acts complained of occurred more than three years prior to commencement of this lawsuit (see Matter of Kaszirer v Kaszirer, 286 AD2d 598 [2001]). The IAS court properly held the [37]*37six-year statute of limitations set forth in CPLR 213 (7) inapplicable since plaintiffs claims are not for corporate waste. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Williams and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kazakhstan Investment Fund Ltd. v. Manolovici, 306 A.D.2d 36, 759 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

306 A.D.2d 36 (Kazakhstan Investment Fund Ltd. v. Manolovici) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NYAHSA Services, Inc., Self-Insurance Trust v. Recco Home Care Services, Inc.
141 A.D.3d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
NYAHSA Services, Inc., Self-Insurance Trust v. People Care Incorporated
141 A.D.3d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Kazakhstan Investment Fund Ltd. v. Manolovici
2 A.D.3d 249 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)