Kaysing v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Kaysing v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 367

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 24, 1958

DocketNo. 62345; protests 288755-K, etc. (St. Louis)

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Cust. Ct. 367 (Kaysing v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaysing v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 367 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of crystal blanks the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 61404, the claim at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 214, as modified by T. D. 51802, for earthy or mineral substances was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of crystal units or oscillators in chief value of metal, used as integral and constituent parts of electrical radios, were held dutiable at 12J4 percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 53739), for parts of radios, in chief value of metal, not specially provided for, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of crystal blanks the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 61404, the claim at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 214, as modified by T. D. 51802, for earthy or mineral substances was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of crystal units or oscillators in chief value of metal, used as integral and constituent parts of electrical radios, were held dutiable at 12J4 percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 53739), for parts of radios, in chief value of metal, not specially provided for, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Cust. Ct. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaysing-v-united-states-cusc-1958.