Kaysing v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 645
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 11, 1957
DocketReap. Dec. 8989; Entry No. A-779, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 645 (Kaysing v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaysing v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 645 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to certain switchgear and parts thereof exported from Germany and entered at Kansas City, Mo.

The cases are before me on a written stipulation of submission establishing that the proper basis for appraisement of the switchgear and parts thereof, represented by the invoice items marked “A” and initialed “EFK,” is cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for the merchandise so identified is the “invoiced unit prices in U. S. dollars, packing included, less postage, inland freight and charges, consular fee, insurance, ocean freight, as invoiced, where specified on the invoices as being included in the invoice prices.” As to other merchandise, not hereinabove identified and included on any of the invoices covered by these appeals for reappraisement, the appraised value is affirmed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaysing-v-united-states-cusc-1957.