Kaylor v. . Sain

176 S.E. 560, 207 N.C. 312
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 31, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 176 S.E. 560 (Kaylor v. . Sain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaylor v. . Sain, 176 S.E. 560, 207 N.C. 312 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“The act complained of must have been with a strong hand, 'manu forti/ and this implies the exercise of greater force than is expressed by the words ‘vi et armis/ Rudeness of language, mere words, *313 or even a slight demonstration of force against which ordinary firmness is a sufficient protection will not constitute the offense.” Anthony v. Protective Union, 206 N. C., 7 (11), and cases there cited.

. We are of the opinion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain an action for trespass against the person or possession of the plaintiff and, therefore, his Honor was correct in granting the motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunbar Corporation v. Lindsey
905 F.2d 754 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)
Dunbar Corp. v. Lindsey
905 F.2d 754 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)
Kirby v. Jules Chain Stores Corp.
188 S.E. 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 S.E. 560, 207 N.C. 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaylor-v-sain-nc-1934.