Kaylon, Inc. v. Goldberg
This text of 154 Misc. 294 (Kaylon, Inc. v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the motion to punish for contempt was not, as required by rule 10 of the court below, noticed for argument within thirty days of the commission of the alleged contempt, and no cause was shown for failure of compliance with the rule, the order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. (Bongiorno v. McGurk, Appellate Term, 1st Dept. Nov. 1933.)
All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 Misc. 294, 276 N.Y.S. 885, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaylon-inc-v-goldberg-nyappterm-1934.