Kayhart v. Whitehead

81 A. 1133, 78 N.J. Eq. 580, 8 Buchanan 580, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 297
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 19, 1911·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons statod in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, -Voorhees, Minturn, Vredenburgh, Congdon — 10. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kayhart v. Whitehead, 81 A. 1133, 78 N.J. Eq. 580, 8 Buchanan 580, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 297 (N.J. 1911).

81 A. 1133 (Kayhart v. Whitehead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Caruso
112 A.2d 532 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)
In Re Bender
192 A. 718 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1937)
Rudd v. Searles
160 N.E. 882 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1928)
In Re Story
138 A. 199 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1927)