Kaye v. Rosefielde
91 A.3d 22, 217 N.J. 586, 2014 WL 2558484, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 545
This text of 91 A.3d 22 (Kaye v. Rosefielde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kaye v. Rosefielde, 91 A.3d 22, 217 N.J. 586, 2014 WL 2558484, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 545 (N.J. 2014).
Opinion
ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issue of whether the Appellate Division erred by affirming the trial court’s holding that economic damages are a necessary prerequisite for disgorgement of the employee’s salary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
BRUCE KAYE VS. ALAN P. ROSEFIELDE VS. DEBORAH KAYE (C-000017-05, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2019
Bruce Kaye v. Alan P. Rosefielde (073353)
121 A.3d 862 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2015)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 A.3d 22, 217 N.J. 586, 2014 WL 2558484, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaye-v-rosefielde-nj-2014.