Kaye v. Kaye

127 A.D.2d 566, 511 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43034
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kaye v. Kaye. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 A.D.2d 682

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated January 21, 1986, which granted the defendant husband’s motion for a protective order quashing a subpoena duces tecum and a notice to take a deposition of a nonparty wdtness.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We cannot say that the court abused its discretion in granting the motion (see, CPLR 3101 [a] [4]; 3103; Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 NY2d 1031). We note that the plaintiff has already been afforded extensive discovery pursuant to this court’s prior directive (see, Kaye v Kaye, 102 AD2d 682). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaye v. Kaye, 127 A.D.2d 566, 511 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

127 A.D.2d 566 (Kaye v. Kaye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc.
473 N.E.2d 1172 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Kaye v. Kaye
102 A.D.2d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)