Kaye v. Kaye

38 A.D.2d 753, 329 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5487
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 1972·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover upon a separation agreement, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 15, 1971, which denied her motion (1) to dismiss the defendant’s affirmative defense and counterclaim for reformation of the agreement and (2) for summary judgment, with an assessment of damages on the second cause of action in the complaint. Order reversed, on [754] the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. In our opinion, section 466 (subd. [e], par. [ii]) of the Family Court Act does not authorize the reformation of a separation agreement which was incorporated in a foreign divorce decree. (See, also, Rehill v. Rehill, 306 N. Y. 126; Farber v. Farber, 25 A D 2d 850.) Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaye v. Kaye, 38 A.D.2d 753, 329 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

38 A.D.2d 753 (Kaye v. Kaye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mass v. Mass
85 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Hirsch v. Hirsch
369 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Iseman v. Iseman
48 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)