Kaye v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
This text of 95 F. App'x 151 (Kaye v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Plaintiff, Armene Kaye, appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. Plaintiff contends that defendant, Daimler-Chrysler Corporation, violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Michigan’s Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act by discriminating against her on the basis of [152]*152her gender and retaliating against plaintiff for complaining to her supervisor by inappropriately transferring plaintiff to a previous job position.
After reviewing the briefs and the record in this case, we believe that the District Court’s comprehensive and thorough opinion adequately addresses all of the issues plaintiff raises on appeal. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the District Court’s grant of summary judgment based on the reasoning in the District Court’s opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaye-v-daimlerchrysler-corp-ca6-2004.