Kaye v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaye v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.

18 A.D.2d 1014, 238 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4136

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1014 (Kaye v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaye v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp., 18 A.D.2d 1014, 238 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover a balance due for services rendered, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 7, 1962, as denied its motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice to examine defendant before trial. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The examination shall proceed on 10 days’ written notice or at such other time and place as may be mutually fixed by written stipulation of the parties. In view of plaintiff’s death on February 3, 1963, this decision is rendered and the order thereon will be entered nunc pro tuna as of January 28, 1963 — the date of the submission of the appeal to this court (see MacLean v. Hart, 262 N. Y. 552; Russell v. Butler Grocery Co., 240 App. Div. 31). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin; and Hopkins, J J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a balance due for services rendered, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 7, 1962, as denied its motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice to examine defendant before trial. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The examination shall proceed on 10 days’ written notice or at such other time and place as may be mutually fixed by written stipulation of the parties. In view of plaintiff’s death on February 3, 1963, this decision is rendered and the order thereon will be entered nunc pro tuna as of January 28, 1963 — the date of the submission of the appeal to this court (see MacLean v. Hart, 262 N. Y. 552; Russell v. Butler Grocery Co., 240 App. Div. 31). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin; and Hopkins, J J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1014, 238 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaye-v-associated-metals-minerals-corp-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack