Kay v. Travelers Insurance

242 A.D. 798

Opinion

Action to recover on a policy of accident insurance. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits at the close of plaintiff’s case on the ground that it affirmatively appeared that the injury was due, at least in part, to a physical infirmity and not solely to accident. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, it was for the jury to determine whether the plaintiff’s bodily injuries were “ effected directly and independently of all other causes ” by the accident and the injury he received thereby on October 29, 1932. (Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 254 N. Y. 81; Schwartz v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Association, 132 Misc. 200; affd., 227 App. Div. 711; affd., 254 N. Y. 523.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kay v. Travelers Insurance, 242 A.D. 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

242 A.D. 798 (Kay v. Travelers Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
171 N.E. 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Schwartz v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America
173 N.E. 849 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Schwartz v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America
227 A.D. 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Schwartz v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Ass'n of America
132 Misc. 200 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)