Kay v. State
48 So. 3d 152, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17931, 2010 WL 4704331
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 22, 2010
DocketNo. 1D09-5175
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 48 So. 3d 152 (Kay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kay v. State, 48 So. 3d 152, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17931, 2010 WL 4704331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
REVERSED. See Yerrick v. State, 979 So.2d 1228, 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“Florida law provides that to prove the crime of grand theft, the State must establish the defendant had the requisite criminal intent at the time of the taking.”); Benitez v. State, 852 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Crawford v. State, 453 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Huggins v. State
135 So. 3d 306 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 So. 3d 152, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17931, 2010 WL 4704331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kay-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.