Kay v. State
48 So. 3d 152, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17931, 2010 WL 4704331
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 2010·No. No. 1D09-5175·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
REVERSED. See Yerrick v. State, 979 So.2d 1228, 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“Florida law provides that to prove the crime of grand theft, the State must establish the defendant had the requisite criminal intent at the time of the taking.”); Benitez v. State, 852 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Crawford v. State, 453 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kay v. State, 48 So. 3d 152, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17931, 2010 WL 4704331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
48 So. 3d 152 (Kay v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huggins v. State
135 So. 3d 306 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)