Kay v. Rowland
This text of 331 S.E.2d 781 (Kay v. Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a custody dispute between the natural father and the maternal grandmother of a six-year-old child. 1 The Family Court found the father fit and proper, and awarded him custody. The grandmother appeals. We affirm.
The parties argue the applicability of this Court’s recent decision in McDowell v. Richardson, 279 S. C. 268, 305 S. E. (2d) 577 (1983). In McDowell, we held it was error to award custody to a grandparent absent a finding that the natural parent was unfit. Thus, we recognized the superior rights of a natural parent in a custody dispute with a third party. Once the natural parent is deemed fit, the issue of custody is decided.
The trial judge found respondent to be a fit and proper parent. The record adequately supports his conclusion. Therefore, he properly awarded custody to respondent. 2 The lower court’s order is accordingly
Affirmed.
The child’s maternal grandmother was permitted to intervene in the divorce action on the issue of custody. Her daughter, the natural mother, does not contest custody, and there is no contention that she would be a proper custodial parent.
The trial judge recognized appellant’s close relationship with her grandson, and awarded her generous visitation privileges.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 S.E.2d 781, 285 S.C. 516, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kay-v-rowland-sc-1985.