Kay v. Kuhlman
This text of 22 S.E.2d 677 (Kay v. Kuhlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “Jurisdiction of a suit by an employee to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation, and an additional equal amount as ‘liquidated damages,’ and attorney’s fees, under the fair-labor standards act of 1938 (29 U. S. C. A. § 216), is not vested exclusively in the courts of the United States, but may be heard and determined in any State court of competent jurisdiction.” Adair v. The Traco Division, 192 Ga. 59 (14 S. E. 2d, 466).
2. The petition in the instant case shows that the suit was brought under the above-referred-to fair-labor act, and the superior court of Gor *259 don County had jurisdiction of the case. The petition set out a cause of action, and the court erred in dismissing it on general demurrer.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 S.E.2d 677, 68 Ga. App. 258, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kay-v-kuhlman-gactapp-1942.