Kay v. Kay

276 A.D.2d 865

This text of 276 A.D.2d 865 (Kay v. Kay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kay v. Kay, 276 A.D.2d 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. Considering the statement in appellant’s brief, on the present appeal, with respect to dispensing with the printing of the record on appeal from the judgment, as a motion for relief in connection with such printing, the motion is granted to the extent of permitting the appeal from the judgment to be prosecuted on the original papers, a typewritten transcript of the stenographer’s minutes, and typewritten briefs, in view of the similar relief which this court granted for the prosecution of the appeal from the order, which has been affirmed herewith. Appellant is directed to file five typewritten copies of her brief and to serve one copy thereof on the attorney for the respondent. The typewritten brief shall be double spaced and each page shall contain not more than three folios. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 A.D.2d 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kay-v-kay-nyappdiv-1949.