Kay v. Frick
211 A.D. 809
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county modified by reducing recovery to $105.16; and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the testimony of plaintiff at folios 65-67 of the record established a locus pcenitentiai for the defendant, and barred plaintiff from recovering damages for wrongful discharge. (Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co., 143 N. Y. Supp. 411; affd., 163 App. Div. 939; Connell v. Averill, 8 id. 524.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kay v. Frick, 211 A.D. 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
211 A.D. 809 (Kay v. Frick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Teich v. Aetna Industrial Corp.
8 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Karas v. H. R. Laboratories, Inc.
271 A.D.2d 530 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)