Kay v. Executors of Kay

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Kay v. Executors of Kay

3 N.J. Eq. 495

DecidedJanuary 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J. Eq. 495 (Kay v. Executors of Kay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kay v. Executors of Kay, 3 N.J. Eq. 495 (N.J. Ct. App. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The complainant is entitled to the relief sought. He takes an absolute interest in the personal estate [503]*503bequeathed to him in the residuary clause of the will, and is entitled to a decree that the whole amount be paid to him. The costs must be paid out of the general estate of the testator.

Decree accordingly.

Cited in Fairchild v. Crane, 2 Beas. 108; Den. v. Baldwin, 1 Zab. 400.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The complainant is entitled to the relief sought. He takes an absolute interest in the personal estate [503]*503bequeathed to him in the residuary clause of the will, and is entitled to a decree that the whole amount be paid to him. The costs must be paid out of the general estate of the testator.

Decree accordingly.

Cited in Fairchild v. Crane, 2 Beas. 108; Den. v. Baldwin, 1 Zab. 400.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.J. Eq. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kay-v-executors-of-kay-njch-1845.