Kay Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 53 F.2d 1083 (Kay Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
KAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Benjamin Mahler, of New York City, for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and J. P. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., and Eugene Harpole and Edwin M. Niess, Sp. Attys., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.
Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F.2d 1083, 10 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 763, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kay-manufacturing-company-v-commissioner-of-intern-ca2-1931.