Kay Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
53 F.2d 1083, 10 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 763, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2837
Opinion
KAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Benjamin Mahler, of New York City, for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and J. P. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., and Eugene Harpole and Edwin M. Niess, Sp. Attys., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.
Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kay Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 53 F.2d 1083, 10 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 763, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2837 (2d Cir. 1931).
53 F.2d 1083 (Kay Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.